Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01616
Original file (BC 2014 01616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01616

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The duty title on his AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report 
(OPR), _closing on 9 Dec 13, be corrected to read “         ”


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was appointed as the      on     .  He forgot to add the 
additional position to his duty title on his OPR.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently a member of the Regular Air Force and 
serving in the grade of colonel (O-6).

On 7 Jan 14, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the contested 
OPR, which reflects the following duty title: “           .”

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial because the applicant has not 
exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to 
seeking correction of his military records and lack of supporting 
evidence.  The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records 
(AFBCMR) is the highest level of administrative appeal within the 
Department of the Air Force.  AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records, states the AFBCMR will not 
consider a case until all avenues of administrative relief have 
been exhausted.  Specifically, the applicant has not requested 
relief through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB).  It is 
recommended the applicant submit a new AF Form 948, Application/or 
Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, with all required 
supporting documentation, through the vMPF/Evaluation Appeals, 
found under the Most Popular Applications.  The applicant may 
resubmit his request to the AFBCMR if the administrative appeal is 
not successful.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 7 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, 
we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal 
within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust 
all available avenues of administrative relief provided by 
existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this 
Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The 
Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this 
application and indicated there is an available avenue of 
administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In 
view of this, we find this application is not ripe for 
adjudication at this level as there exists a subordinate level of 
appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of 
the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


?
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-01616 in Executive Session on 25 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01616 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIDE, dated 25 Nov 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 15.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01942

    Original file (BC 2014 01942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial. In accordance with AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, the AFBCMR is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. Therefore, recommend the Board deny his request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00711

    Original file (BC 2014 00711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial as the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01687

    Original file (BC 2014 01687 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, chapter 10, paragraph 10.1.1: The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was established to provide all Air Force personnel with an avenue of relief for correcting errors or injustices in evaluations at the lowest possible level. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01523

    Original file (BC 2014 01523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01523 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 911, Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), ending 30 Sep 12, be replaced with a new report. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00930

    Original file (BC 2014 00930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her requests, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of her AF Forms 911, email communiques’, letters of support and various other documents associated with her requests. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDE, dated 1 Dec 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01821

    Original file (BC 2014 01821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01821 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His performance report rendered for the period 1 Apr 12 – 31 Mar 13 be replaced with a revised report. In addition, since the changes being requested is not considered minor corrections to the existing OPR on file, the applicant will need to include a wet- signed supporting memorandum from additional rater in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00407

    Original file (BC 2014 00407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of her military record. The change the applicant is requesting is not for minor corrections, so she will need to provide a memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01806

    Original file (BC 2014 01806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. In addition, since the change the applicant is requesting is not for minor corrections to the existing EPRs on file, the applicant will also need to provide wet signed memorandums of support from all the original evaluators who made the content/rating change(s), which details the error and the need...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00936

    Original file (BC 2014 00936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00936 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR) (Lt thru Col) rendered for the period 15 Mar 12 through 15 Feb 13, be removed from her official record. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00618

    Original file (BC 2014 00618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDE, dated 27 May 14.